5000 word summary (question format)

chapters [various questions]

becoming a pilot

1. kid

[was ben born into an aviation family? did he build aeroplanes and model aircraft, and fly in aircraft since birth?]

2. teen

[did ben do aerobatics? was ben a passenger in a ww2 fighter plane when it crashed?]

3. uni-student

[did ben become a commercial pilot? did he love aerobatics? did he specialise in aviation in his science degree?]

4. mr darby’s intermission

[was ben confident in his abilities?]

5. the key is motivation

[did ben put most of his money, energy, and life into aviation?]

think for yourself

6. who goes to germany for kung fu, anyway?

[did ben become a fighter, in preparation for becoming a fighter pilot?]

7. analysis of the analyst’s analytics

[did ben's dad train ben how to look, observe, search, and think like a pilot?]

8. how are you? okay, thanks

[did the royal australian air force (raaf) conduct extensive medical examinations and conclude ben was fit and healthy when joined the raaf?]

9. trust me; i’m from the government

[did the australian defence force (adf) mislead people that vaccines are 'perfectly safe' but admit to others they are not? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says they must brief adf members on vaccine risks? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says they must allow time for members to discuss the risks?]

10. when you said, “no, no, no, no, no, no!” did you, err, mean yes?

[did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says the adf member must be able to make an informed decision (meaning the member must possess all relevant facts, including knowledge of potential side-effects and their rate of occurrence / frequency) before giving valid, informed consent for each vaccination? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says valid consent must be obtained and the adf must inform the member of possible adverse events?]

forcing vaccinations

11. you don’t gotta, but, you really gotta

[did ben say he did not want the vaccinations? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says adf members are at liberty to refuse vaccinations? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says an adf member must have time and an opportunity to read the relevant vaccine risk information, understand it, request more information, and decide not to proceed with the vaccination? did the adf fail to follow such regulations by threatening to sack / discharge members who refuse vaccinations? does the adf still publish such threats online (as of 26 december 2009)?]

12. what’d i just say? i forgot what i was saying

[did the adf fail to follow their regulations that say the adf must check for signs and indications that a particular member should not be vaccinated (aka ‘contraindications’)? did the adf do tests on ben to see if he should be vaccinated? did those tests show that ben should not have been vaccinated? did the adf vaccinate ben even though the pathology test results indicated that was the wrong thing to do?]

13. unlucky

[did ben suffer an adverse drug reaction to the adf vaccinations? did the adf need to take ben to the emergency department of a hospital? did ben become dizzy and sick?]

14. under your hat

[did the adf fail to follow the directions of the australian government’s medical directives that say adf medical practitioners should report of an adverse drug reaction such as ben suffered? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says the adf must report any unexpected adverse event possibly related to the vaccination? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says the raaf has to report all occupational health and safety incidents and complete an ac563 incident report? did the adf fail to comply with their reporting requirements?]

15. what would happen, if…?

[did the adf doctors realise ben became unwell after the first vaccinations? did the adf doctors realise the cause and document that ben was ‘unwell after last twinrix [vaccination]? did the doctors realise there was a possible causal link? did the doctors see that as sufficient indication of an adverse drug reaction, and therefore an unwarranted risk, and therefore used that as the reason against giving twinrix (vaccination) to ben again? did the adf again fail to follow their regulation about contraindications? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says they must check if ben is unwell, or whether ben has suppressed immunity? did the adf doctors realise that ben’s immune system was now so bad that he should not have the twinrix (dead) vaccine, but illogically decided to give him multiple live vaccines? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says live vaccines should not be administered to persons with altered immunity, or immune suppression, or even where a person’s ‘normal immunological mechanism may be impaired’, or even to their household contacts? did the adf vaccinate the other 20+ guys who lived with ben, despite those regulations? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says the adf must check if the member is healthy enough to receive the vaccination? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says ‘if there is any doubt about an individual’s fitness to receive a vaccine’ the member is to consult the medical officer? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says that in situations such as ben’s the adf must seek further advice from a public health physician with expertise in vaccination and contact the state immunisation section or the local public health unit? did ben refuse the vaccinations? did the adf give ben four live vaccines anyway?]

aftermath

16. i knew’d he crash’d on six’clock news; didn’t think he’d do it ag’in on ten’clock

[did ben repeatedly express concerns about his immune system? did ben refuse more vaccinations? did the adf administer more vaccines anyway? did ben suffer multiple adverse drug reactions? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says viral infections and immunosuppression can render useless the test for tuberculosis? did the adf do the test anyway? did the adf then rely on that unreliable test’s result as the basis for a decision to vaccinate ben again? did the adf ignore contraindications (and related regulations) again? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says that giving the live tuberculosis vaccine to someone who immuno-compromised can cause infections and is contraindicated? does the adf vaccinate ben with live vaccines again? does ben suffer another adverse drug reaction?]

17. missed it, by that much

[does ben now suffer recurrent infections and viral illnesses for many months? does ben suffer severe infections and lose his voice for weeks? does ben almost die from influenza ‘a’ and pneumonia?]

18. persistence

[does the adf repeatedly deny ben’s adverse drug reaction and refuse to send ben to a specialist immunologist?]

19. oh, that immune system problem

[does an air force pilot intervene and pressure the adf doctors to send ben to an immunologist? does the immunologist see that ben was well, fit, healthy, and enjoying normal immune function prior to vaccinations, and see that ben then suffered a year of ill health—almost to the point of death—after the vaccinations? does the immunologist test and diagnoses ben with an immunodeficiency? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says the adf doctors must provide and manage a rehabilitation program? did the adf fail to follow their regulation that says the adf must provide occupational rehabilitation?]

20. which won is it?

[does the immunologist decide ben needs blood infusions every 21 days (which costs around $30,000 per year!) because his immune system no longer works properly? did the adf doctor give ben a copy of the regulations that showed the adf broke the rules? did that document show that after adf vaccinations ben suffered an adverse drug reaction; and that the adf broke numerous regulations in the vaccination process? did the adf continue to hide this information from the medical authorities and fail to report both the adverse reaction and the regulatory breaches?]

unreachable equity

21. the world Spins madly on

[did ben continue to suffer vertigo, disequilibrium, and dizziness?]

22. 10100100001 (undoublelucky)

[are ben’s medical problems incredibly rare in the australian population? on the small air force base where ben lives did other air force pilots suffer similar problems, and does one even take the exact same blood infusion treatment? is that amazing, indicative of a problem, or indicative of something suspicious?]

23. healthcare for Senior officers and junior officers

[does the adf know about human rights and the universal declaration of human rights? do air force airmen, junior officers, and senior officers all have equal rights to healthcare and medical services? do junior officers have the right to fair and just work conditions? is the adf against workplace discrimination?]

24. things will be fine, now that we all agree.

[did the doctors, specialists, medical authorities and military employment authorities agree that ben should be on blood infusions?]

25. what would raaf doctors know about raaf medicine?

[did ben have the right to privacy in relation to his personal medical-in-confidence classified information just like everyone else? did the adf leak out a great deal of that information without ben’s permission? is that evidenced by emails sent and phone calls made by ben’s boss?]

aussie science fiction

26. hg: part one

[did the medic and the pilot know they were leaking out classified information? did this medic and this pilot know that neither of them were doctors? did they know that they disagreed with all the doctors? did they know that doctors know more about medicine than pilots do? did they know that their interference with ben’s medical treatment would constitute discrimination, denial of human rights, and breaches in many, many adf regulations? did the pilot kick ben off pilots’ course? did the pilot keep changing his reasons for kicking ben off course as ben kept proving him wrong? did the pilot give false information about ben’s deployability, which disagreed with the assessments of the doctors and his superior officers? did the pilot confess to contacting a specialist immunologist in newcastle and informing said specialist that the adf needed ben to be taken off blood infusions and cleared of his immunodeficiency diagnosis so that ben could return to flying/working? did the medic and the pilot dream up a spurious requirement for a ‘review’ and the necessity of a ‘resolution of [ben’s] medical condition?]

27. hg: part two

[did the adf doctors confirm that they were in no way responsible for the mess the pilot and medic created (above)? did the adf now refuse to provide the medical treatment it said ben needed, and thus breach both human rights- and adf-regulations? did the medic and pilot fail to justify their decisions? did the specialist immunologist confirm the pilot’s confession that he phoned the specialist to ask him to clear ben of his diagnosis? did the specialist proudly say he would do just that? did the blood test results show ben’s immune levels were lower/worse, but that with a convenient shift of the ‘normal’ reference range, the specialist cleared ben of his diagnosis? did the adf execute the decision to cease ben’s blood infusion treatment during late april 2001 until 2 may 2001? did the adf claim that the decision to do so was made a month or two after that? does the adf seem unable to produce a working time-machine? does the adf know that without a time-machine it is very unlikely that the adf did actually execute a decision many weeks before it made the decision? does the adf know that its notion of thinking up something to do in june 2001, then going back to april and early may 2001 and doing it, is one of history’s least believable claims? do most people assess this is a lamely attempted cover-up?]

28. a break in the obedience drought

[did ben write a document telling the adf they should follow their vaccination regulations? did the adf then begin giving vaccine risk information to members? did that cause an incident on the hmas kanimbla (navy vessel) on its way to fight in the gulf? did sailors now use their right to refuse vaccinations? did choppers fly the sailors back to shore? did the sydney morning herald publish stories about that? did the journalist fail to mention that the commencement of (obeying regulations about) the provision of risk information highlighted the fact the adf had been failing to obey the regulations for countless years? or decades?]

29. confessions

[did the adf admit in writing that ben suffered an adverse drug reaction? did new scientific data confirm what ben reported about his dizziness? does the adf continue to breach human rights, providing healthcare to senior officers but not to ben? do the adf doctors notice major inconsistencies in the medical and administrative handling of ben’s case? do adf officers document that the adf is taking ben ‘around the bouy’ and ‘stonewalling’ him? does the adf continue to refuse to report or investigate?]

30. ron flew into the cuckoo’s box canyon

[does the adf produce more and more conflicting information? does the adf realise that the blood infusion treatment is the only known / proven way to help ben? does the adf continue to refuse to provide (in accordance with human rights declarations) ben with healthcare that is equal with what the adf provides other officers? does the adf discriminate against ben? does the adf refuse to say sorry? does the adf refuse to investigate?]

how to test it

31. complete lists of: guilty adf members, crimes, dates & times, evidence & proof, witness Statements.

[joke]

32. tga: first contact

[does the therapeutic goods administration (tga) begin to help ben? do the tga reports show that there are many, many adverse drug reactions in australia?]

33. tga: you ain’t the only one

[do the tga reports show that other australians have suffered adverse drug reaction symptoms similar to ben, after having the same type of vaccines? does the tga assess the vaccines as the sole suspect (ie the only probable cause) in many of these cases? does ben again ask the adf to report his adverse drug reaction? does the adf continue to refuse to report ben’s adverse reaction? does ben report it?]

34. tga: the expert’s opinion

[does ben want to determine if the experts assess the adf vaccines are the most likely cause of ben’s symptoms? does tga check its database and carefully assess ben’s case? is the investigating officer the australian government's expert in this area of investigation? does tga’s adverse drug reaction specialist confirm that the answer to ben’s question, as to what is the most likely cause of his symptoms, is in fact the adf vaccinations?]

35. tga makes a short story long

[does tga say they will help? does tga now refuse to help? does tga say adrac’s job is assessing adverse drug reactions? does tga refuse to tell ben or the department of veterans’ affairs about their assessment and conclusion? does tga give false information about its ability to provide information to ben, since it has already assessed ben’s case, and has displayed its ability to confirm causation, and its ability to type and send a letter in the mail to ben? does the australian government once again give ben the silent treatment?]

specialist’s chiasmus

36. Someone else’s opinion

[does ben’s commanding officer assess as a significant problem the ‘lack of supporting information in regard to a number of decisions made by medical authorities? is the co’s officer commanding also concerned? does the adf fail to follow its regulation concerning the provision of justifying reasons for adf medical decisions affecting a member? does ben’s co also state that the adf ought to clarify a number of inconsistencies in the handling of ben’s medical case? does the co confirm that legal advice supports ben’s view? does the air commodore commanding the whole force element group also have interest in this matter, but has too been unsuccessful? does the co indicate that ben has been prejudiced? does ben’s co attempt ‘to prevent [ben] from being prejudiced any further’? does ben’s co admit, in writing, ‘that the raaf would have some difficulty in justifying all its actions if it were to face a challenge to its handling of this matter’? ]

37. i can’t testify; i work for ron

[does an adf specialist diagnose ben with pressure vertigo? does that specialist admit his vertigo resulted from adverse drug reactions to vaccines? does that adf specialist refuse to document that? does the scientific testing confirm what ben reported?]

38. another specialist blames vaccines

[does another specialist confirm the adf vaccines are the cause? does ben uncover scientific medical research that supports his claim?]

39. vemp 3

[does this specialist consult his lawyer, and then go silent too? do the scientific medical tests continue to support ben’s claims? could one fairly interpret those test results as being either for or against ben’s claim?]

40. you can but you cannot

[does the adf continue to contradict itself?]

department of veterans’ affairs

41. a little help from my friends

[does ben seek help from numerous people and organisations?]

42. dva 1: ron confesses

[does the adf give misleading information to ben about whether or not anyone can investigate? does the adf give misleading information to ben about when the department of veterans’ affairs can investigate? did ben’s commanding officer give misleading information to ben concerning healthcare not being part of the co’s responsibilities? did adf officers confirm in writing that air force medical staff did not follow adf regulations and directives? could the adf commence an investigation in november 2000? did the adf officers choose not to investigate at this time, and instead tick the box showing that a formal investigation was not to follow? did this frustrate ben? did someone else direct ben to the department of veterans’ affairs?]

43. dva2: we’ll wait patiently

[did the department of veterans’ affairs (dva) seek a copy of ben’s medical file? did dva lead ben to submit a claim, while assuring him that dva would wait for ben to give specialist reports to dva? did a (new) commanding officer support ben in his claim for compensation from the adf for the vaccines causing his medical condition?]

44. dva3: speak engrish good we

[did dva break their word and assess ben’s case before ben provided the evidence? did ben ask them to stop, and expunge their first assessment? did dva respond by going further and repeating their assessment? did dva realise they made a mistake (or three)? did dva then maintain its errant conclusion anyway?]

45. dva4: we’ll do our best to help

[did dva pledge to do its best to obtain the aforementioned medical information from tga, on ben’s behalf? did dva discuss the issue of the delay? did dva state that the delay would not be an issue? did dva lead ben to submit a claim for compensation and rehabilitation?]

Should i be Surprised?

46. dva5: time’s up, too late, too bad

[did ben submit a claim in late 2009? did dva go back on its word and fail to seek information from tga? did dva go back on its word and make an issue out of the delay?]

47. dva6: just go away, ben!

[did ben knock down dva’s argument? did dva maintain its stance against ben, but change its argument? did dva continue to refuse to seek information from tga, and fairly to assess ben’s claim? did dva produce ridiculous arguments in some sort of an attempt to dismiss ben?]

48. DVA7: DVA’s last bird

[does dva's gillian tate really attempt to win an argument by countering positive medical opinions with statements of 'i don't know'? does gillian tate argue that i could not possibly think something in 2008 since i thought something different in 2004? does gillian tate appear to ignore two hundred pages of evidence and then claim that there is no evidence? does gillian tate try to establish an argument against vaccine causation by arguing that she has reports by people who say they do not have a diagnosis and do not know the cause? does gillian tate refer to a report a doctor whom i never even consulted about vaccinations nor causation? does gillian tate completely fail to understand the medical reports she quotes? does gillian tate ignore the fact dva has never investigated documents that i have submitted as evidence?]

49. dva8: another chance

[shall I send out a message to dva?]

50. dva9: reserved

[this space is reserved for DVA to reconsider their actions and, for once, fairly assess the evidence]

is there a problem, officer?

51. throw you behind bars, we will

[what happened in ben's last couple of hours in the military? did ronny raaf finally investigate and give ben a copy of 400 page report? did ronny raaf intentionally withhold the report until the very last opportunity to hand it over? did ron know that ben could not possibly read the 400 page report in ten to twenty minutes? did ron quote a regulation that was still valid, but was going to become invalid by the time it would be relevant and applicable? did ron use that regulation as a way to threaten to imprison ben if ben spoke about the contents of the investigation report? did ron pretend the regulation was applicable when he knew that it was now? did ron put on a little act? had ron been acting the whole time? is ron an actor? although ron's letter appeared legit, was it really completely misleading? did ron know that an officer cadet is unable to request ministerial approval to release information, and receive such ministerial approval in writing, in less than half an hour? was ron breaking the law by pretending a regulation would continue to remain in force for more than a couple of hours? was ronny raaf really being deceptive in the way led ben to believe the regulation would be valid perpetually, and that ben could therefore 'never' disclose the information without ministerial approval? was ronny raaf really being deceptive in the way it threatened ben? when the minister for defence personnel reviewed the matter in 2009 did the chief of staff confirm that the regulation was, in fact, not in any way applicable to ben, and therefore that ronny raaf misled ben? did the minister's office inform ben, the exact opposite of what ronny raaf said, namely that ben was not breaking any law, and that such disclosure is not an offence after all? is this evidence that ronny raaf, very cleverly, orchestrated a cover-up, or that ronny raaf just accidentally threatened to imprison ben in a way that was not completely true, open, and honest?]

52. woof

[did nothing come of the request for woffraaf to investigate?]

53. drip, drip, leak

[did a senior raaf officer warn ben that the raaf doctors were continuing to break the law?]

54. maybe it’s in ya head

[did jane doe confirm what the raaf senior officer alleged? did the raaf doctors threaten to discharge ben, without justifcation or foundation, on psych' grounds?]

55. investigation is so s.e.p.

[did nothing come of the request for dpo to investigate?]

piggy in the middle

56. i’m a doctor; i’m here to help

[did nothing come of the request for dg-dhS to investigate?]

57. deo: deliberate exclusion opportunity

[did nothing come of the request for deo to investigate?]

58. dfo: definitely forget officiousness

[did nothing come of the request for dfo to investigate?]

59. complain? yes. investigate? no.

[did ronny raaf keep bouncing me around so that nobody ever investigated? did i lodge formal complaints? did ron break the law by repeatedly disuading me from submitting a redress of grievance?]

60. houston

[did the caf personally commit to investigate? did he then go silent and fail to produce any investigation report?]

man, it’s dark under this blindfold

61. bloody discharge at vaccination site

[in the end, did ron deny ben the information (justifying reasons for ronny raaf's medical decisions) ben required to appeal the medical board decision? did ron deny the facts of ben's medical condition at the same time as ron discharged ben because of the same medical condition? did ron ignore the deployable, fast jet pilot on intragam blood infusions, discriminate against ben, and discharge ben on grounds that nobody can be deployable whilst on intragam? did ron illegally discharge ben?]

62. when everything halts

[did ron convince ben that regulation 63 of the defence (inquiry) regulations bound ben to remain silent about the raaf investigation report, or face imprisonment? did the australian government later reveal to ben that ronny raaf deceived ben? did the raaf illegally cover up many regulatory breaches and lies?]

63. letter from the government the other day

[did the deputy prime minister offer his assistance? did the deputy prime minister do nothing more than just repeat the instruction to wait? after I waited, and waited, and let's face it, six years is a long time to wait, did the deputy prime minister invite me to contact him again? after I waited and contacted the deputy prime minister again, did he choose to do nothing? was the deputy prime minister all talk and no action; a giver of false hope?]

64. just quietly, i prefer my own witnesses

[was ronny raff's 'independent' investigating officer really just another air force wing commander? did I give the investigating officer a list of witnesses? did this air force wing commander completely refuse or fail to contact or interview any of them? did this air force wing commander decide that, instead of interviewing my witnesses, he would just pick his own witnesses to interview?]

65. a’liddle busy today; sorry

[did the air force wing commander investigating officer choose not to interview any witnesses from DPO, even though a very large percentage of my redress directly involved DPO?]

don’t rock the boat

66. the system is nobody and nowhere

[did my redress relate predominantly to systemic problems in the raaf, and in particular to DPO and DHS? did the two wing commanders in charge of the *cough* 'investigation' decide to avoid investigating systemic problems, and most everything in my complaint about DPO and DHS? did the two wing commanders proceed with the investigation, knowing that they had no authority to investigate most of my claims?]

67. csi:diy

[did i provide the investigating officers with sufficient information? is it a tiny bit suspicious that few people signed their names clearly, and some did not sign at all? is that one type of behaviour you would expect where someone is breaking the law, or forcing a subordinate to break the law? could the investigating officers easily find out who worked at 6 hospital at a certain time? could the investigators easily ask staff members about their work conditions, workload, time constraints, how rushed they were, and about other pressures that made it difficult or impossible to follow the vaccination regulations and guidelines? could the investigators easily contact all the 6 hospital staff? could the investigators easily contact other nurses and medical assistants to uncover how well the raaf follows/followed vaccination procedures? instead of contacting 50 healthcare providers, and instead of contacting 10 healthcare providers, and instead of contacting all the staff from the little 6 hospital, did the investigators contact only 1? did the investigators contact the person most responsible for any regulatory breach, and therefore least likely to confess or testify in a way that would support my claim? did the investigator contact the person with the biggest conflict of interest?]

68. off balance

[were ronny raaf's arguments: (1) ignore ben's witnesses so his claim is not corroborated, and (2) ignore ben's evidence since it is ben's evidence?]

69. I See Nuttink

[did ronny raaf ignore the witnesses and the evidence, then say there is no evidence either way, and thus conclude that ronny raaf broke no laws?]

70. Houston, we have a time travel problem

[does ronny raaf fail to investigate unauthorised access to private information and breaches of the privacy act? does the wing commander who formerly denied contacting my specialist, now admit to phoning him? does ronny raaf fail to investigate why a pilot was permitted to overturn years of medical decision making? does ronny raaf fail to investigate why a pilot was permitted to affect my healthcare? does ronny raaf reject evidence because I am qualified neither as a doctor nor scientist? does ronny raaf fail to investigate why a senior officer jet pilot is permitted Intragam treatment, but I am denied it? does ronny raaf fail to investigate discrimination? does ronny raaf fail to investigate refusal of healthcare under human rights legislation? does ronny raaf conclude that the cessation of my intragam treatment in late april or very early many 2001 was an action executed two months before the decision to act? does ronny raaf know that such a conclusion is impossible?]

don’t call us; we’ll maul you

71. you know it aint no good

[did the investigating legalo admit there needs to be further investigations in dpo and dhs? did he also conclude that dpo should have taken a more positive and proactive position a lot earlier?]

72. whet your appetite

[in the end, did the rog investigating officer find that it is likely ronny raaf did not provide sufficient risk information? did he find that the delays were not reasonable? did he find that significant delays occured as a result of lack of priority in appropriate corporate management, or as a result of nor enforcing more stringent timeliness on these processes? did he find that I was not afforded appropriate opportunity for development or advancement? did he find that ronny raaf failed to make definitive decisions on several occasions? did he find that medical decisions were inconsistent? did he find that the conditions of service that held me at low rank and pay and which were used to justify the raaf's decision not to promote me wre not applicable and so were misapplied? did he find that further investigation is required? did he find that some inconsistent decisions were not formally explained to the satisfaction of the member? did he find that various raaf processes need to be reviewed? did he find that I have (in my medical documents) a noted reaction to vaccinations? did he recommend the DPO and DHS initiate various investigations? did he recommend that dhs write to me to explain my the inconsistencies in their deciion making? did he admit he could not make some judgments until DPO and DHS conduct their investigations into systemic failures in the raaf?]

73. lawyers cannot really help yet

[do the lawyers feel there is not much they can do for me, yet?]

74. DFO2

[does dfo say it cannot do anything for me, yet?]

75. all too much

[is it unreasonable to fire eight million tennis balls at someone, one at a time? is it unreasonable to tell him, 'if you just hit the next three back into our court, then we will sort out everything for you'? is it fair to say that after admitting they had made many mistakes, and that I suffered reactions to raaf vaccinations, the air force failed to do anything to help me? is it true that the ROG investigation has done nothing to redress anything? is it completely accurate that DPO, DHS, and CAF either never conducted investigations, nor informed ben, nor apologised, nor remunerated ben, nor helped ben after the alleged investigations; or all of the above?]

waiting on Rudd and his boys

76. flick pass

[did a lawyer challenge ronny raaf? did the minister cnofirm ronny raaf's threat was not applicable? did the lawyer also seek an update from the olc CO HQ44WG? ]

77. too scared to catch

[did the lawyer seek explanation from the minister? did the minister hand the job over to group captain ehlers? did the old CO HQ44WG hand the job over to to group captain ehlers? did group captain ehlers just hand the jobs off to defence legal? did defence legal go silent and say nothing to me or to my lawyer?]

references: hyper-links: current at end of 2009.
australian immunisation handbook, ed 7, published may 2000, and adfp702, current in 2002 when i submitted most of this story to ron.

chapter 1 published 14 december 2009,
by benjamin may.

© benjamin may 2010 all rights reserved.